What Are The difference between PCR and real-time PCR ?

介紹

聚合酶鍊式反應 (聚合酶鍊式反應) revolutionized medical research when it was invented in the 1980s. This technique takes advantage of a natural DNA replication process to amplify specific genetic sequences rapidly for further study. PCR opened up new possibilities for genetics research and clinical diagnostics.

A more advanced form of PCR called real-time PCR, later built upon this discovery. Real-time PCR provides additional capabilities that make it ideal for certain applications where standard PCR fails.

Understanding when to use each method enables researchers to optimize experiments and clinicians to provide better patient care.

What is Traditional PCR and why is it Important？

Kary Mullis first discovered PCR while driving along a moonlit highway. This Nobel Prize-winning technique exploits the natural DNA replication process to exponentially amplify targeted genetic sequences in vitro.

PCR enabled scientists to study minute genetic samples undetectable through other means. It also provided a rapid, affordable alternative to DNA cloning experiments that once took weeks or months.

How Does Traditional PCR work？

PCR consists of repeated temperature cycles to facilitate DNA denaturation, primer annealing, and sequence extension by a heat-stable DNA polymerase. 後 30-40 週期, sufficient copies exist for analysis and downstream applications.

The process involves three key steps:

● Denaturation: Heating separates the DNA double helix into single strands
● Annealing: Cooling allows primers to bind to their complementary sequences
● Extension: DNA polymerase synthesizes new strands using primers

The cycle is then repeated, with the number of target DNA copies approximately doubling each round. 後 30+ 週期, over a billion copies exist.

What can You use Traditional PCR For?

PCR opened up new possibilities in genetic research and clinical diagnostics due to its reliability, adaptability, and simplicity.

The uses of this PCR include:

● Detecting genetic mutations
● Cloning and sequencing DNA
● Analyzing forensic evidence
● Diagnosing pathogens and diseases

What Limitations Does Traditional PCR Have?

While traditional PCR qualitatively detects a target sequence, it lacks quantification capabilities. End-point detection methods only confirm the presence vs absence of amplification. Researchers lacked a tool to quantitatively measure genetic biomarkers for applications like:

● Precise gene expression analysis
● Detecting minimal residual disease in cancer
● Viral load monitoring of infections
● High throughput genetic screening

what is Real-Time PCR and when was it Developed?

實時定量PCR, also called quantitative PCR (定量PCR), finally brought absolute DNA quantification capabilities to PCR in the early 1990s.

Specialized instruments detect fluorescence from DNA-binding dyes or sequence-specific probes with each temperature cycle. The software generates real-time amplification plots used to precisely quantify starting DNA.

How Does Real-Time PCR Work?

Real-time PCR incorporates fluorescent reporter dyes or sequence-specific probes to enable DNA quantification during amplification. The key steps are:

● Fluorescent labels intercalate or hybridize to amplify DNA
● specialized instruments detect fluorescence each cycle
● the software generates amplification plots
● quantification analysis calculates absolute starting DNA levels
So by monitoring fluorescence throughout the exponential amplification process, real-time PCR facilitates sensitive quantitative detection.

What advantages Does it offer?

While standard PCR qualitatively detects a genetic sequence, real-time PCR during amplification quantifies the initial amount through fluorescence.

This key difference makes real-time PCR ideal for:

● Precisely measuring gene expression
● Detecting minimum residual disease
● Viral load monitoring
● Diagnostic screening
● High throughput genetic analysis

How Does Real-Time PCR Enable Quantitative Detection？

Real-time PCR facilitates precise DNA quantification through the use of fluorescent reporter systems that interact with the amplifying DNA strands. There are two main types:

• Non-specific DNA Dyes
  Fluorescence dyes like SYBR Green can bind to and intercalate within any double-stranded DNA. As amplification proceeds exponentially during PCR, more labeled DNA accumulates and fluorescence intensity increases proportionally. Specialized instruments monitor this intensity after each cycle. By determining the cycle where fluorescence exceeds background (Cq), the software calculates the absolute quantity of initial DNA

• sequence-specif probes
  Sequence-specific probes like TaqMan probes and molecular beacons only bind and quantify target DNA sequences. These probes contain a fluorescent reporter dye and a quencher molecule. When bound to the target, reporter fluorescence gets quenched. During amplification, polymerase activity releases the probe, isolating the reporter from the quencher and emitting fluorescence.

How is Real-Time PCR Better Than Traditional PCR?

Real-time PCR improves upon traditional PCR’s sensitivity, 特異性, 和速度:

● Quantifies initial DNA levels through fluorescence
● Increased sensitivity and accuracy
● Faster time-to-results without post-PCR steps
● Higher throughput with multi-well plates
● Automation improves reproducibility

So for any application requiring sensitive quantification or rapid analysis, rt PCR excels over conventional PCR.

Comparing Traditional PCR and Real-Time PCR

Here is a comparison of traditional PCR vs real-time PCR that can help you to decide between two traditional PCR and real-time PCR :

What Do Most Clinicians Recommend Between Traditional PCR and Real-Time PCR?

Both standard and real-time PCR have revolutionized research and diagnostics by enabling sensitive genetic analysis. 然而, many scientists and clinicians recommend rt PCR over traditional PCR for applications requiring:

● Absolute quantification of DNA levels
● Rapid results in clinical settings
● High throughput testing capabilities
● Maximum detection sensitivity

For qualitative detection, traditional PCR is the best method. But rt PCR’s precision quantification and speed have made it an essential tool across genetics research and molecular diagnostics.

Final Thought

while both methods offer sensitive and specific DNA amplification, real-time PCR provides additional capabilities like absolute quantification, higher throughput, increased speed, and sensitivity that make it ideal for certain applications in research and molecular diagnostics. The choice depends primarily on the need for quantification vs simple qualitative detection.